Why early AML builds stronger FinTech foundations

AML

FinTech startups are often encouraged to prioritise rapid product releases and worry about compliance later, but this approach increasingly proves costly.

For many young firms, the first serious challenge arrives when a banking partner presses for evidence of controls or a regulatory letter arrives unexpectedly. By then, teams can find themselves halting their product roadmaps to retrofit compliance frameworks under pressure, according to Flagright.

Recent industry data underscores why this reactive stance is risky. Research has shown that nearly all financial institutions reported year-on-year increases in the cost of financial crime compliance. At the same time, regulators across global markets continued to issue multi-bn-dollar penalties for anti-money laundering (AML) failures. These fines serve as a stark warning that legacy, manual or improvised approaches to compliance are slow, expensive, and vulnerable to scrutiny.

A growing number of technology leaders now argue that AML should be treated as a core product surface rather than an operational afterthought. Rather than slowing teams down, building compliance into the product from the beginning can accelerate launches. Startups traditionally assume that full AML controls require months to deploy, with public timelines from some vendors quoting 6–10 weeks for transaction monitoring alone and up to 16 weeks for complete suites. By contrast, the Flagright Startup Program positions itself around two-week go-lives, supported by an API-first model designed to embed risk controls from the start.

For most early-stage FinTechs operating within their first two years, the priority is not expansive governance structures but a centralised AML stack that handles essential workflows. That includes screening at onboarding and throughout the customer lifecycle, transaction monitoring with scenarios that do not require constant engineering oversight, dynamic risk scoring, and case management tools investigators actually want to use. The Flagright Startup Program aims to deliver these capabilities immediately rather than offering restricted entry-level packages that must be replaced later.

Pricing is another pain point for young firms. Several vendors have launched “free” startup tiers, but the true cost often emerges in engineering work, limited functionality, or sudden upgrade requirements. Flagright instead offers discounted pricing for predictable runway management, with 60% off in the first year and 30% off in the second, alongside unlimited seats and high-availability uptime to prevent compliance bottlenecks.

Customer feedback reflects the operational gains that some startups are seeing. Flagright co-founder and CTO Ian Njuguna said, “Within a week, we had Flagright’s systems up and running… I can’t see anything else right now that gives you as big an impact.” Another client, AI Forensics head of risk and compliance Dustin Eaton said, “From transaction monitoring to quality assurance, AI Forensics has transformed how we approach compliance.” These testimonials describe reductions in manual workload, lower friction for teams, and improved regulatory performance.

The application process is positioned as simple, with basic eligibility requirements for young companies and a two-week integration window that includes guided onboarding and pre-configured templates. Continued support in the first month is designed to ensure that teams are ready to scale safely.

With regulators increasingly shifting towards expectations of real-time monitoring and AI-supported analytics, the case for building AML foundations early is strengthening. Rather than delaying innovation, integrating compliance at the outset can enable faster product releases, more resilient operations, and scalable risk management across the startup’s growth journey.

Read the daily RegTech news

Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst

Enjoyed the story? 

Subscribe to our weekly RegTech newsletter and get the latest industry news & research

Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst

Investors

The following investor(s) were tagged in this article.