The COVID-19 pandemic was a defining moment for global financial systems, exposing deep vulnerabilities in the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing. As economies staggered under unprecedented disruption, criminals adapted quickly to exploit weaknesses in oversight, regulation, and technology.
According to Arctic Intelligence, fraud, cybercrime, and illicit finance surged in new forms, forcing governments and financial institutions to reassess the resilience of anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) frameworks.
The scale of fraudulent activity during the pandemic was striking. Emergency relief programmes became a prime target, with fraudsters using stolen identities and fake businesses to siphon funds from unemployment schemes and loan initiatives. Criminal networks also turned public fear into opportunity, selling counterfeit protective equipment, unapproved medical treatments, and operating fake charities to attract donations. What began as a public health crisis swiftly transformed into fertile ground for financial crime.
Alongside this, cybercrime rose dramatically. The shift to remote work and rapid digitalisation created an ideal environment for attacks. Phishing campaigns disguised as health authority messages, ransomware targeting healthcare and education, and e-commerce fraud all escalated. Criminals exploited the sudden reliance on digital systems, taking advantage of vulnerabilities in online platforms and payment systems. For regulators and compliance teams, this presented a daunting challenge as digital fraud evolved faster than oversight could adapt.
Money laundering strategies also shifted during lockdowns. With cash-based methods disrupted, criminals leaned more heavily on cryptocurrencies, trade-based money laundering schemes, and informal channels such as hawala networks. The rapid adoption of digital currencies offered anonymity and easier cross-border transfers, making them a preferred option for illicit flows. This placed added strain on regulators, who were already facing resource shortages and the practical difficulties of remote compliance monitoring.
Financial institutions struggled to maintain robust oversight under these conditions. Suspicious activity reports were often delayed, customer due diligence became harder in a remote environment, and regulatory frameworks lagged behind new threats such as the misuse of digital assets. Compliance teams found themselves stretched, with resource constraints undermining their ability to act swiftly on emerging red flags.
Governments and international organisations have since responded with new legislative measures to close these gaps. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) led with guidance advocating risk-based approaches and stronger oversight of virtual assets. In Europe, successive AML Directives tightened scrutiny on virtual asset service providers, while in the US, the AML Act of 2020 introduced beneficial ownership transparency and reforms to cryptocurrency regulation. These moves reflect a recognition that post-pandemic crime requires modernised tools and cross-border cooperation.
Central to these reforms has been the regulation of digital assets. The FATF’s Travel Rule, mandating greater transparency in virtual asset transfers, has been adopted by many jurisdictions. At the same time, countries exploring central bank digital currencies have prioritised embedding AML/CTF safeguards from the outset. Transparency around beneficial ownership has also become a legislative priority, with registers of ultimate beneficial owners enabling regulators to pierce through corporate veils and better trace illicit financial flows.
Public-private partnerships have played a key role in strengthening defences. Initiatives such as the UK’s Joint Money Laundering Intelligence Taskforce demonstrate how collaboration between regulators, financial institutions, and technology firms can enhance intelligence-sharing and bolster compliance. The adoption of AI-driven monitoring tools has also empowered institutions to spot suspicious activities in increasingly complex transaction flows.
Despite these advances, challenges persist. Striking a balance between innovation and regulation remains difficult, particularly around emerging technologies such as decentralised finance. Smaller firms often lack the resources to implement costly compliance requirements, leaving them exposed. Data privacy also complicates efforts, as transparency initiatives such as beneficial ownership registers must be reconciled with strict privacy laws. At a global level, inconsistent adoption of international standards leaves gaps that criminals can exploit.
The pandemic highlighted that resilience depends on adaptability. Legislative reforms have laid important foundations, but ongoing commitment is essential. Policymakers must continue investing in technology, training, and international cooperation to strengthen financial integrity. The experience of COVID-19 has shown that crises accelerate both innovation and exploitation. By embedding flexible, tech-driven compliance measures, financial systems can be better equipped to face the next disruption.
The lessons of the pandemic era underline the importance of harmonised regulation, public-private collaboration, and continuous innovation. As economies recover, these efforts will be vital in ensuring financial systems remain resilient, transparent, and secure against evolving AML and CTF threats.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
