Suspicious Matter Reporting (SMR) has become a central component of global efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.
As criminals continue to exploit professional services to move illicit funds, sectors such as legal services, accounting, real estate, and TCSPs have been placed under increasing scrutiny, claims Arctic Intelligence.
These professions, often labelled as financial “gatekeepers”, facilitate or oversee transactions that can be attractive to criminal networks attempting to hide the origin of funds. Their role makes early detection and reporting of unusual behaviour essential.
Across many jurisdictions, these professionals are legally obligated to submit SMRs to financial intelligence units (FIUs) or relevant enforcement authorities whenever they believe that a client, transaction, or activity may be linked to criminal proceeds or terrorist financing. The aim is not only to disrupt illicit financial flows but also to ensure that non-financial professions contribute meaningfully to the wider AML and CTF ecosystem. While the scope and depth of reporting obligations vary globally, the underlying purpose remains consistent: identifying suspicious behaviour before it becomes embedded in the financial system.
Understanding the foundations of SMR obligations begins with recognising suspicious activity. This can take the form of unexplained wealth, unusually complex deal structures, large transactions with vague reasoning, or links to high-risk jurisdictions and politically exposed persons. Professionals may also come across shell companies, layered ownership models or transactions that appear inconsistent with a client’s known background. Identifying these irregularities early is key to preventing financial crimes from progressing undetected.
The legal landscape underpinning SMR obligations spans international guidance and domestic law. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plays a central role by issuing global standards designed to curb ML and TF. FATF Recommendation 22 sets the expectations for non-financial sectors, emphasising that SAR or SMR filings must occur when reasonable grounds for suspicion arise. Countries then build their own frameworks on top of these standards. In the UK, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and Money Laundering Regulations mandate reporting to the National Crime Agency. In the US, the Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act shape obligations for financial and professional firms, requiring SARs to be submitted to FinCEN. In Australia, the AML/CTF Act 2006 requires SMR submissions to AUSTRAC. These frameworks collectively aim to close gaps that criminals may attempt to exploit across borders.
Once suspicious behaviour is identified, the reporting process begins. Professionals must provide authorities with detailed information about the transaction, the individuals involved, and the rationale behind their concerns. This must be done discreetly, as most regimes impose strict confidentiality obligations preventing professionals from alerting clients that a report has been filed. Equally, protections are built into legislation to ensure professionals are not penalised when making reports in good faith.
Despite its importance, SMR compliance remains challenging. Determining what qualifies as suspicious is highly subjective, often leading to uncertainty and inconsistencies in reporting across firms. For smaller practices, the administrative and resource burden can be significant, while reputational concerns—particularly the fear of upsetting or losing clients—can discourage some professionals from escalating cases. As regulatory requirements continue to evolve, staying compliant requires ongoing vigilance and investment in staff training, technology, and robust internal procedures.
To address these pressures, firms are increasingly turning to best-practice frameworks. Regular education and training sessions help professionals understand both regulatory obligations and emerging criminal typologies. Clear internal policies ensure consistency when handling potential SMR triggers.
Some firms formalise the process further by establishing compliance teams or adopting automated monitoring tools that detect unusual activities. Creating a culture where employees feel comfortable escalating concerns without fear of backlash is also essential to effective reporting.
Ultimately, SMR remains a cornerstone of global AML and CTF frameworks. Lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and TCSPs play an indispensable role in preventing illicit financial flows. By embracing their obligations, maintaining strong internal processes, and staying informed on regulatory developments, professionals can significantly contribute to safeguarding the integrity of financial systems worldwide.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
