For financial institutions operating in an increasingly complex regulatory environment, protecting customers and transactions has become a core operational priority.
As financial crime techniques grow more sophisticated, firms must ensure that legitimate business activity is not exploited for money laundering or corruption, said SmartSearch.
One of the most important tools within any AML framework is politically exposed person (PEP) screening, which helps institutions identify higher-risk individuals and apply appropriate safeguards.
To build a robust defence against financial crime, firms need a clear understanding of how the PEP screening process works in practice. From onboarding through to ongoing monitoring, effective screening ensures risks are identified early, assessed accurately and managed in line with regulatory expectations. This is particularly important as regulators continue to raise the bar on transparency, accountability and financial crime controls across FinTech and traditional financial services alike.
Before examining the mechanics of screening, it is essential to understand what a PEP actually is. A politically exposed person is an individual who holds, or has held, a prominent public position that may expose them to a higher risk of corruption or undue influence. This can include senior government officials, judges, senior military figures or board members of central banks. Close family members and known associates are also classified as PEPs due to their proximity to power. Importantly, being identified as a PEP does not imply wrongdoing, but it does trigger the need for enhanced due diligence.
The PEP screening process typically begins during customer onboarding, when financial institutions collect key identifying information. This includes personal details such as name, date of birth and address, alongside employment data, identity documents and information on the source of wealth and funds. Accurate data collection at this stage is critical, as incomplete or inconsistent information can undermine the effectiveness of later screening.
Once collected, customer data is screened against global PEP databases and watchlists. These databases consolidate thousands of international sources into a single reference point, allowing institutions to identify potential matches quickly. If a possible match is identified, the customer is flagged for further investigation rather than automatically rejected.
Verification and risk assessment then follow. Compliance teams or a money laundering reporting officer will review the alert to confirm whether the individual is genuinely a PEP and assess their risk profile. Factors such as political influence, geographic exposure, transaction behaviour and source of wealth are evaluated to determine whether enhanced due diligence is required.
Enhanced due diligence involves deeper investigation into the legitimacy of funds and transactions. This may include analysing media coverage, verifying beneficial ownership structures and documenting findings for internal review. Where suspicious activity is identified, escalation procedures apply, including the submission of suspicious activity reports to the relevant authorities.
Crucially, PEP screening does not end at onboarding. Political roles and risk profiles can change over time, making ongoing monitoring essential. Regular screening, transaction monitoring and automated alerts help institutions maintain compliance and respond quickly to emerging risks.
Despite its importance, PEP screening presents challenges. High alert volumes, inconsistent data and limited compliance resources can place pressure on teams, particularly in smaller firms. However, risk-based approaches and automated RegTech solutions can help institutions focus efforts where they are most needed.
Ultimately, effective PEP screening is not just about regulatory compliance. It plays a central role in protecting businesses from financial, legal and reputational harm while reinforcing trust with customers and regulators alike.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
