For decades, false positives have been seen as one of the biggest challenges in AML. Technology vendors and compliance teams alike have focused on ways to reduce them, often framing it as the key to making AML more efficient.
But a new perspective is emerging—false positives don’t really matter anymore. Artificial intelligence has changed the game, not by reducing alerts, but by handling them in ways humans simply can’t, claims Workfusion.
This might sound counterintuitive. Reducing false positives has long been a rallying cry for compliance professionals. Yet this focus keeps the industry tethered to outdated approaches that slow down adoption of more transformative solutions. AI-driven systems can now take on the heavy lifting, making false positives a non-issue rather than the central challenge of AML.
AI may eventually reduce the number of alerts generated by monitoring systems, but its immediate value lies elsewhere. Today, AI can automate the entire review process for sanctions, watchlists, adverse media, and politically exposed person (PEP) alerts. Within seconds, AI can replicate what human analysts do—gather data, compare it across sources, reason through inconsistencies, and either close an alert or escalate it for further investigation.
The issue with false positives stems from how AML has always worked. Screening and monitoring systems cast a deliberately wide net to ensure that suspicious activity is not missed. Over 90% of alerts are technically valid—they exist because systems are designed to be overly sensitive. Missing a true positive is a genuine regulatory risk, but relying on names and other imperfect identifiers has always meant endless alerts.
Historically, banks and financial institutions have responded by hiring large teams or outsourcing this manual work. The repetitive nature of the task leads to high staff turnover and errors, creating backlogs that increase both operational costs and regulatory exposure. This is where AI offers a decisive breakthrough.
Modern computing technologies such as machine learning, natural language processing, intelligent document processing, and large language models are now being deployed to mimic the reasoning steps analysts take every day. For example, when a name matches a sanctions list, AI can instantly compare addresses, birth dates, or even additional adverse media data to reach a clear decision. Each step is logged, providing a full audit trail and regulatory compliance.
What makes this transformative is speed and scale. AI does the work of hundreds of analysts in nanoseconds, never deviates from procedures, and can incorporate far more data without slowing down. Tasks that once took several minutes per alert can now be resolved instantly, removing backlogs and reducing the risk of missing suspicious activity.
Beyond sanctions screening, AI is also revolutionising adverse media checks and enhanced due diligence. From scanning multiple articles to extracting relevant details, AI now automates steps that once consumed hours of analyst time. In transaction monitoring, AI is beginning to classify and recommend decisions for common alerts, further reducing the manual workload.
The real promise of AI is not in reducing false positives but in resolving them—every single one—within seconds. For an industry where innovation has often come slowly, this marks a profound shift. Compliance teams must rethink long-standing assumptions and recognise that challenges which once seemed insurmountable are no longer relevant. The age of AI-driven AML has arrived, freeing institutions to focus on the risks that truly matter.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
