The cyber threat landscape is shifting at an unprecedented pace. No longer confined to opportunistic attacks, cyber criminals are now deploying generative AI tools to automate reconnaissance, identify zero-day vulnerabilities, and adapt attacks in real time.
According to ACA Group, this evolution means organisations face not only faster but also smarter threats, with half of all vulnerabilities discovered in the past year being completely new. In this environment, penetration testing has moved from being a compliance requirement to a strategic investment, with research suggesting every $1 spent can save up to $10 in potential breach costs.
For many years, penetration testing was little more than a box-ticking exercise. A survey conducted during ACA’s webcast Anticipating the Attack revealed that 58% of firms only test once annually or on an ad-hoc basis, often focusing narrowly on external networks. This approach leaves critical systems such as cloud infrastructure, wireless networks, and internal environments exposed, creating blind spots attackers are quick to exploit. With threats now continuous, annual testing simply isn’t enough.
The shift in mindset is already visible, particularly in financial services. Organisations are adopting a more frequent cadence for testing, recognising that being secure last quarter means little in the face of constantly emerging attack vectors. One midsized firm that switched from annual to quarterly testing cut unresolved vulnerabilities by 42% within six months. This proactive approach not only enhances resilience but also demonstrates to regulators and stakeholders a clear commitment to cybersecurity.
Penetration testing itself is a controlled simulation of an attack, designed to probe and exploit weaknesses across networks, applications, and systems. Unlike vulnerability scanning, which is automated and identifies known risks, penetration testing goes further by actively attempting to exploit weaknesses to understand their real-world impact. For organisations, this distinction is vital, as scans alone cannot reveal how vulnerabilities might be chained together in an actual attack. Both practices must be combined for effective defence.
Modern IT infrastructure spans a wide attack surface, including cloud platforms, internal networks, wireless environments, and third-party integrations. Each layer carries distinct risks. For example, external-facing assets are vulnerable to brute force attempts, while misconfigured cloud services or insider threats can open back doors. Comprehensive penetration testing should address all these areas, tailoring efforts to specific organisational needs.
Testing methodologies also vary depending on risk profile. Black box testing mimics an external hacker with no prior knowledge of systems, while white box testing gives full access to code and configurations for a deep assessment. Grey box testing offers a middle ground, replicating scenarios where attackers gain partial knowledge. Using all three approaches provides the most effective coverage.
To match the speed of modern threats, penetration testing should be continuous and event-driven. Organisations can adopt a layered roadmap: testing after major IT changes, running weekly automated checks for simple vulnerabilities, carrying out quarterly targeted tests, conducting bi-annual full scope reviews, and hosting annual red team exercises to simulate sophisticated adversaries.
Ultimately, an organisation’s security is defined by its weakest link. As cyberattacks grow more advanced, traditional once-a-year testing falls short. Continuous penetration testing ensures vulnerabilities are identified early, mitigated quickly, and monitored regularly, providing both resilience against attackers and confidence to stakeholders and regulators alike.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
