In an age where risks are converging and spreading faster than ever, Moody’s has released a new thought leadership study exploring the rise of URM.
The report offers deep insights into how global executives are reshaping their risk strategies to strengthen resilience and turn uncertainty into competitive advantage.
The study is based on interviews with 50 senior executives spanning risk, compliance, finance, and procurement functions. Their collective message is clear—risks such as cyberattacks, supply chain failures, and compliance breaches are no longer isolated or contained. One contributor summarised this reality succinctly: “You don’t own the risk, but you carry the consequence.”
According to Moody’s, today’s interconnected operating environment has given rise to what many now describe as “Exponential Risk”—a dynamic in which threats multiply, overlap, and accelerate beyond the reach of traditional controls. From third-party incidents to data breaches, a single disruption can rapidly cascade across compliance, customer service, and market access.
Executives featured in the report argue that the old, siloed models of risk ownership can no longer keep pace with this level of complexity. As one board director remarked, “Risks don’t respect our org charts…Unless we manage risk as one connected system, we’re always going to be one step behind.” This sentiment underscores a broader industry shift from reactive compliance to proactive, connected risk management.
Moody’s research identifies a subset of organisations already redefining what modern risk management looks like. These frontrunners view risk as a strategic asset rather than a compliance burden. They are moving from manual to data-driven systems, embedding automation, analytics, and cross-functional collaboration at the heart of their frameworks. Risk, for them, is not merely a safeguard—it is a shared language across the boardroom.
However, the study also notes that many companies still face an “execution gap.” Although most understand the importance of unifying risk practices, they often struggle with fragmented data, disjointed systems, and unclear accountability structures. Bridging this divide will be critical to transforming awareness into measurable resilience.
Moody’s highlights four practical strategies that organisations can adopt to close this gap and harness the benefits of URM. These include data consolidation to provide a unified view of risk and compliance; cross-functional collaboration to drive shared intelligence; automation and analytics for predictive insights; and governance alignment to establish clear ownership and accountability.
While respondents acknowledge the potential of URM, they also raise valid concerns. Many point to the challenges of integrating new frameworks with legacy tools, managing overlap between departments, and ensuring sector-specific adaptability. Despite these hurdles, the overall sentiment is optimistic—URM is emerging not as another framework, but as a new organisational mindset.
Moody’s concludes that the epicentre of risk management has shifted decisively—from focusing purely on financial stability to embracing operational resilience. Unified Risk Management, the firm suggests, is as much about cultural evolution as it is about technology—signalling a broader transformation from control to connection, and from compliance to readiness.
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
