In 2025, the UK’s FCA delivered a forceful reminder to regulated firms that weaknesses in systems and controls—particularly those linked to financial crime and AML —carry significant financial and reputational consequences.
According to Alessa, by year-end, total enforcement penalties had exceeded £124m, with the most substantial fines tied directly to AML failings. The pattern of enforcement reveals not isolated lapses, but systemic weaknesses in governance, monitoring and risk management frameworks.
Among the most prominent penalties was a £39.3m fine imposed on Barclays Bank plc. The FCA found that the bank failed to properly identify, assess and manage money laundering risks in relation to a long-standing corporate banking relationship. According to the regulator, deficiencies in risk assessment and ongoing monitoring persisted over several years, exposing deeper control weaknesses. The case reinforces a critical lesson for firms: AML risk assessments must be regularly refreshed and supported by robust transaction monitoring. Static frameworks quickly become regulatory liabilities.
The largest fine of the year—£44.1m—was levied against Nationwide Building Society for breaches of Principle 3 concerning systems and controls. The FCA highlighted shortcomings in governance and oversight, signalling that accountability at senior management level remains central to regulatory expectations.
Governance failures, the regulator suggested, can be just as damaging as technical control breakdowns, particularly where leadership fails to actively oversee AML frameworks.
Digital challenger Monzo Bank Limited was fined £21.1m after rapid customer growth outpaced the maturity of its compliance controls. The FCA stressed that innovation and expansion do not dilute regulatory standards.
As onboarding volumes increase, so too must the sophistication of customer due diligence (CDD) and transaction monitoring systems. Growth, if not matched by control scalability, can amplify financial crime exposure.
Beyond traditional banking, the FCA also penalised the London Metal Exchange £9.2m for failings related to market conduct and control frameworks. The action demonstrated that AML and financial crime scrutiny extends well beyond retail and commercial banks. Market operators and non-bank financial institutions remain firmly within supervisory focus.
In a separate action, Barclays Bank UK plc was fined £3.1m for deficiencies in account opening controls linked to client money accounts. Weak onboarding processes continue to feature prominently in enforcement outcomes, underlining the importance of strong know your customer (KYC) frameworks at the start of the customer lifecycle.
Across these cases, several consistent themes emerge: inadequate transaction monitoring that failed to detect suspicious behaviour; weak governance and oversight; outdated customer risk assessments; reporting deficiencies affecting accuracy and timeliness; and an overreliance on manual processes that increased operational error. Taken together, the FCA’s approach suggests a shift away from box-ticking compliance towards demonstrable effectiveness. Firms must show not only that policies exist, but that controls function in practice.
Against this backdrop, AML technology is playing an increasingly critical role. Regulators expect firms to evidence how alerts are prioritised, how false positives are reduced and how suspicious activity is escalated and reported. Integrated compliance platforms such as Alessa aim to support this transition by offering consolidated visibility across onboarding, monitoring and regulatory reporting.
Several practical lessons stand out. Reducing alert fatigue without compromising coverage is essential, particularly where excessive alerts obscure meaningful risk signals. Strengthening enhanced due diligence (EDD) processes ensures high-risk customers are investigated thoroughly and decisions are defensible.
Automating regulatory reporting can help improve accuracy, timeliness and auditability. Scalable transaction monitoring frameworks are vital for both challenger and established institutions, while robust sanctions and watchlist screening remains critical amid rapidly evolving global regimes.
The FCA’s largest fines of 2025 send a clear and consistent message: AML failures are costly, reputationally damaging and increasingly preventable. Firms that align people, processes and technology—and invest in integrated, well-governed compliance infrastructure—will be better placed to meet supervisory expectations. In doing so, regulatory pressure can become a catalyst for long-term resilience rather than a recurring source of enforcement risk.
Copyright © 2026 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
