The compliance scalability crisis is no longer theoretical. Across FinTech, digital banking and broader financial services, exponential data growth is colliding with compliance infrastructures that were built for a different era.
At the heart of the issue is a mathematical imbalance: compliance data inputs are growing at an exponential rate, while compliance operations still scale linearly, said Muinmos in a recent LinkedIn post.
The first force reshaping the landscape is the explosion in compliance data inputs. Customer volumes at FinTech firms and digital banks are expanding at breakneck speed, in some cases by around 150% per year.
At the same time, the number of external data sources required for verification, sanctions screening and transaction monitoring has multiplied into the thousands. Each new customer now generates more data points than ever before, spanning multiple jurisdictions, additional beneficial owners and increasingly complex transaction histories.
On top of that, regulatory expansion continues unabated. Every new rule or supervisory expectation introduces further data fields to capture, assess and retain.
The second force pulling in the opposite direction is the way compliance operations scale. Despite rapid innovation in RegTech, many firms still rely on analysts manually accessing multiple siloed systems for every decision.
Human capacity for data hunting and correlation remains fixed. As more data sources are introduced, the time required to cross-check and reconcile them increases proportionally. In practical terms, hiring tends to scale one-to-one with workload. More alerts, more customers and more jurisdictions typically mean more analysts.
This mismatch creates what can only be described as a structural bottleneck. Consider a simplified growth trajectory. In year one, 10,000 compliance decisions across three data sources might require 20 analysts. By year two, 25,000 decisions across five sources may demand 50 analysts.
By year three, 60,000 decisions across eight sources could require 120 analysts. By year four, 150,000 decisions across 12 sources might push headcount requirements to 300 analysts. With customer growth of 150% and rising data complexity per customer, compliance capacity would need to expand by 2.5x or more every year just to stand still. For most organisations, that level of sustained hiring is commercially and operationally unrealistic.
Yet many firms attempt to solve the problem incrementally. They invest in tools designed to speed up individual data lookups or streamline specific workflow steps. While these enhancements can deliver marginal efficiency gains, they do not address the underlying issue. The core bottleneck is not simple access to information; it is the manual correlation of data across fragmented systems.
Much of today’s compliance architecture was designed for a 2006 reality: one-time onboarding, periodic reviews and a limited set of data feeds. The 2026 environment looks very different. Continuous monitoring across hundreds of systems is becoming the norm, not the exception. Attempting to bolt modern data demands onto a linear, siloed architecture only amplifies inefficiencies. Critically, firms cannot hire their way out of exponential data growth if the foundational model remains unchanged.
To keep scaling where others fail, organisations must move away from disconnected, silo-based data architectures. That means rethinking how compliance data is ingested, unified and analysed across the enterprise. Instead of treating each source as a separate workflow, firms need integrated, interoperable systems that enable automated correlation at scale. Without that structural shift, the compliance scalability crisis will intensify as data volumes continue to surge.
Copyright © 2026 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
