As financial crime grows more complex and voluminous, traditional AML systems are struggling to keep up. In 2023 alone, financial institutions in the US filed over 4.6 million Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), placing immense strain on investigative teams.
According to Consilient, manual triage, static rules, and limited resources are no longer sufficient. Institutions need a smarter, more scalable approach to prioritising threats—and machine learning-driven risk scoring is emerging as a powerful solution.
Rather than changing how alerts are detected, transaction-level risk scoring works as an overlay, assigning severity scores to each alert. These scores reflect the actual exposure of each transaction, based on patterns, anomalies, and typology indicators. Investigators can then prioritise high-risk cases first, without altering existing detection engines, rulesets, or workflows. The result is faster triage, higher precision, and minimal operational disruption.
Risk scoring enhances existing AML workflows without replacing them. Teams don’t need to retrain staff, rewrite rules, or overhaul systems. Instead, the model supports smarter queue management, ensuring high-severity alerts reach the right investigators at the right time. This improves both auditability and resource allocation. Crucially, every decision can be traced back to the model’s logic, maintaining transparency and governance integrity.
Most AML models rely solely on an institution’s past alerts—a dynamic known as closed-loop learning. This can reinforce bias, ignore data drift, and limit adaptability. In contrast, Consilient’s model employs federated learning. This privacy-preserving approach draws insights from multiple financial institutions without sharing sensitive data, allowing the model to learn from a wider pool of behaviours, detect novel typologies, and stay adaptive.
Financial institutions adopting this approach are already seeing measurable results. A leading US bank using federated risk scoring cut time spent on low-priority alerts by 80%. A mid-sized institution used the model on historic alerts and uncovered three times more high-risk cases than previously identified. A specialist compliance unit accelerated escalation timelines and aligned more effectively with governance standards. These outcomes demonstrate that improved prioritisation doesn’t require disruptive change.
Despite common misconceptions, adding a scoring layer does not undermine existing controls. Alerts aren’t removed or ignored—they’re simply reordered for smarter triage. Because the model is explainable and fits into standard governance frameworks, it supports stronger regulatory compliance, especially as banking agencies continue to cite a significant portion of institutions for BSA violations each year.
Ultimately, smarter AML triage is about precision. By implementing transaction risk scoring—especially one trained across peer institutions—financial firms can enhance investigative focus, reduce inefficiencies, and raise overall confidence in their compliance process. It’s a high-impact upgrade that works with, not against, your existing tech stack.
Keep up with all the latest RegTech news here
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
