As financial sectors globally face increased regulatory pressures, the fiscal footprint of maintaining compliance has surged dramatically.
According to AscentAI, annually, regions including Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and North America invest a staggering $206bn in adhering to financial crime compliance standards. A significant portion of this, $61bn, is shouldered by North American firms alone. These figures reflect not just a monetary commitment but also the extensive burden individual firms encounter in their compliance efforts.
Since 2016, the landscape of regulatory compliance has evolved with an astounding 61% rise in employee hours spent on regulatory activities and examiner mandates. The financial toll on IT budgets is equally notable; banks have increased their compliance-related IT expenditures from 9.6% in 2016 to 13.4% in 2023, indicating a shift towards more technologically driven compliance strategies.
Research from financial services firm Model Office, in collaboration with Fidelity Adviser Solutions, indicates that compliance costs average 19% of annual revenues, varying by company size. These figures starkly illustrate the ongoing challenges posed by the rapidly changing regulatory environment—a consequence of the global financial crisis of 2008. This evolving regulatory landscape forces Risk and Compliance teams to often make decisions based on incomplete information, potentially leading to non-compliance and increased risk.
The penalties for non-compliance are even more daunting, often resulting in substantial fines and severe reputational damage. An illustrative case is TD Bank, whose neglect of compliance priorities culminated in a massive fine and a negative revision of its outlook by Fitch Ratings in May 2024. Such penalties underscore the long-term reputational harm and loss of business opportunities that non-compliance can precipitate.
In total, the financial repercussions of non-compliance are approximately 2.71 times greater than the costs of maintaining robust compliance programs. This disparity highlights the system’s inherent design to incentivize compliance to avoid severe penalties.
Non-compliance costs extend beyond fines; they also include the intangible losses related to reputational damage and the adverse impact on staff morale. A 2014 Deloitte survey found that 87% of executives view reputational risk as more crucial than other strategic risks, emphasizing the lasting impact of reputational damage on revenue, brand value, and regulatory scrutiny.
In an era marked by high uncertainty and rapid regulatory changes, financial institutions are compelled to reconsider their budget allocations to risk and compliance. To navigate this complex environment cost-effectively, firms are increasingly turning to a balanced mix of automation, skilled personnel, and optimized processes. This approach aims to maximize resource efficiency while safeguarding against the costly pitfalls of non-compliance.
Keep up with all the latest RegTech news here
Copyright © 2025 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
