If the Revolut fine in Italy proves anything, it is that regulators police the gaps in financial promotions just as vigorously as the claims themselves.
Italy’s competition watchdog, the AGCM, handed the FinTech giant an €11.5m penalty for misleading commercial practices. Crucially, the ruling did not hinge on falsehoods, stated RegTech firm Karavel.
Karavel recently delved into a discussion on the idea that what you fail to say in a financial promotion Is just as regulated as what you do say.
Instead, the regulator found that Revolut’s marketing created impressions about fees, features and account terms that the accompanying small print failed to properly correct. The distance between what consumers believed they were getting and what they actually signed up for proved wide enough to justify a substantial sanction.
This is far from a uniquely Italian issue. It reflects a deeper truth about how financial promotions succeed or fall apart across every market.
Financial promotions law in the UK, as in most comparable jurisdictions, extends beyond false statements to cover misleading omissions. A promotion that is technically accurate but withholds information a consumer needs to grasp the true offer is non-compliant.
This is a tougher discipline than many appreciate. Marketing teams are conditioned to spotlight a product’s most attractive features, such as zero fees, market-rate FX and instant access, while giving far less prominence to the conditions attached, the exclusions, or the costs that surface once headline terms lapse. The result inside many firms is a structural tension: marketing optimises for conversion, compliance optimises for accuracy, and regulatory risk sits in the space between them.
UK rules also lean heavily on the notion of the first point of contact. The FCA has consistently stressed that promotions must be clear, fair and not misleading in the impression they generate, not merely in their technical accuracy.
A consumer who forms a reasonable but incorrect understanding from a social media advert has been misled, even if accurate detail sits elsewhere on a website in smaller text. Firms cannot rely on later disclosure to repair an initial false impression, and for businesses operating at scale across social channels, paid search, in-app notifications and influencer tie-ups, every touchpoint is potentially a financial promotion.
There is a bigger structural problem at play. Promotions compliance, done properly, demands rapid review against an evolving rulebook, across multiple formats, with a full audit trail. Manual processes at most firms simply cannot match the volume and velocity of modern FinTech marketing, forcing a false choice between speed and compliance that the industry has learned to treat as normal.
The Revolut case shows what that trade-off costs when it collapses: beyond the headline figure sit reputational harm, intensified scrutiny, and a warning shot to regulators in other markets. For fast-growing firms, getting promotions compliance right at speed is not a luxury. It is the table stake.
Read the full Karavel post here.
Stay ahead of the regulatory curve with strategic intelligence and early insight trusted by industry leaders. Subscribe to the RegTech Analyst newsletter today.
Copyright © 2026 RegTech Analyst
Copyright © 2018 RegTech Analyst
